Contract mandate · CAP-03

GPUaaS contracts, read properly before you sign.

A reserved GPU capacity agreement is one of the largest multi-year commitments an AI business makes, and it is frequently signed off a pricing table rather than a contract review. The rate you agreed and the rate you effectively pay are almost never the same number.

Before you sign a multi-year number. Term, prepayment, power cost at the site, cooling type and fabric move the price more than the platform does. To get a real number against a specific requirement, open a file on the GPU clusters & GPUaaS desk — end users only.

01

What a contract mandate covers

  • Structure selection

    Reserved, committed-spend, on-demand or a blend. The wrong structure costs more than a bad rate inside the right one.

  • Effective-cost modelling

    What you will actually pay once utilisation, preemption, storage, egress and support are included — not the headline node-hour rate.

  • Term negotiation

    The clauses below, worked line by line, against a benchmark of what comparable buyers are getting.

  • Counterparty diligence

    Whether the provider can actually deliver the capacity they have committed to, for the length of the term. In a market this young, that is a real question.

02

Six terms that decide your effective rate

  1. What a node-hour actually means. Whether the clock runs on allocation or on availability, whether a degraded node bills at full rate, and whether a failed node inside a cluster stops the meter for the whole cluster. On large training runs this single definition can dominate everything else in the contract.
  2. Goodput, not raw hours. A cluster delivering nominal availability while dropping jobs to node failures is not delivering what you bought. Where possible we push toward a measure tied to completed work rather than hours allocated.
  3. Commitment burn-down and rollover. If you underconsume in a period, does the commitment roll forward, expire, or convert? Expiring commitments on a workload whose shape is still moving is how buyers end up paying for capacity they never used.
  4. Preemption and reclaim rights. On anything below firm reserved capacity, the provider's right to reclaim your nodes — and the notice you get — is the difference between a usable tier and a cheap one that cannot carry production.
  5. Storage, egress and interconnect. Rarely in the headline pricing, frequently a material share of the bill, and the primary mechanism by which a cheap compute rate becomes an expensive relationship. Caps and included allowances are negotiable.
  6. Term length against the hardware cycle. Offtakers commit in three-to-five-year windows for a reason: beyond five years you are underwriting a GPU generation you cannot forecast, and below three the provider cannot finance the capacity. Anything outside that band needs a structural reason, and if a provider is pushing for more, the price should reflect what you are absorbing.
  7. Exit, portability and step-downs. Whether the rate steps down as the market moves, what happens on a change of control, and how you get your data and checkpoints out. A multi-year term without a step-down mechanism is a bet that prices will not fall.

The rate is a marketing number. The definitions are the contract.

03

Provider diligence is part of the negotiation

The GPUaaS market has grown faster than its operators’ balance sheets. A three-year commitment to a provider whose own capacity is financed against contracts like yours carries a risk that is not in the pricing table.

  • Capacity provenance

    Whether the provider owns, leases or resells the underlying facility and hardware, and whether the capacity you are committing to actually exists yet.

  • Concentration

    How much of the provider’s footprint sits in one site, one utility, one landlord or one anchor customer.

  • Continuity terms

    What you hold if the provider fails mid-term — step-in rights, data escrow, migration assistance, and whether the commitment survives an assignment you did not choose.

Questions

Asked on this mandate.

01

Do you resell GPU capacity?

No. We hold no inventory and take no position in the agreement. You contract directly with the provider, and we are paid by the ecosystem rather than from your committed spend.

02

We are mid-negotiation on a reserved capacity deal. Is it too late?

No, and this is one of the most common points at which buyers reach us. Mid-negotiation is when the definitions are still open, and the definitions are where the money is.

03

Can you benchmark what we have been quoted?

Yes. We know what comparable buyers are paying for comparable commitments at comparable term lengths, which lets you judge whether the number in front of you is fair before you anchor to it.

04

Should we be renting at all, or should we own?

It depends on utilisation, workload stability and how much the capital treatment matters. We model all three routes honestly because we have no preferred answer — see the GPU procurement mandate for the ownership side.

05

Which providers do you work across?

Hyperscalers, neoclouds and specialist GPUaaS operators, in every region we cover. We are not a reseller for any of them, so no shortlist we bring you is a shortlist we need you to pick from.

Send us the term sheet.

We will tell you what it actually costs, which definitions to fix, and where it sits against comparable deals.

Book 30 minutesRequest the qualification →