Strictly confidential
Offtaker qualification.
The instrument we run before any introduction is made. It is not published. We send it once we know who we are sending it to.
Eight sections, and none of them are filler.
Every field exists because a deal has stalled on it before. Completed properly, it is the difference between an enquiry and a position that can be held.
The offtaker
Legal entity, parent or guarantor, and the contact who can speak for both.
The ultimate offtaker test
Whether the named entity is the party whose workload occupies the capacity and whose balance sheet stands behind the contract. The single question that determines whether a position can be held.
Requirement and workload
Product, workload type, expected utilisation, and where it runs today.
Capacity, timing and term
MW at RFS as critical IT load, total contracted, density, the earliest and latest dates you can accept, and ranked target markets.
Ramp schedule
How the load actually arrives, year by year, and which tranches are firm rather than contingent.
Hardware bill of materials
Equipment class, model, quantity, racks and kW per rack. Hardware determines density and cooling, and therefore price per kW.
Resilience, connectivity and compliance
Redundancy tier, uptime requirement, carriers and cross-connects, and any regulatory obligations.
Commitment readiness
Budget, signatory, NDA position and deposit capability. This decides how hard a position can be reserved.
Because of what it asks for.
The instrument records an offtaker's identity, load profile, ramp schedule and commitment position — close to the most sensitive information a buyer holds. Publishing a document like that for anyone to download would be inconsistent with the way we handle everything else, and we are not willing to do it.
It also runs both ways. We do not send it to parties we cannot act for, because a half-completed qualification circulating with our name on it is worse than none at all.
Requesting access takes a minute. Within one business day you will get one of three things: the instrument, a direct answer about why we are not the right party for your requirement, or a referral to someone who is.
All three are useful, and none of them cost you anything.
If you are not sure the instrument is the right starting point, the GPU and GPUaaS mandate sets out what we can actually access, capacity commercialization covers the operator side of the same table, and the firm page explains who you would be dealing with.
If you would rather talk before committing anything to paper, book thirty minutes. Anonymous first contact is fine and an MNDA is available before anything specific is discussed.
Tell us where you are.
Six fields. Enough to know whether we can act for you.